[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: too many buffers
From: |
Richard Riley |
Subject: |
Re: too many buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:21:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Elena <egarrulo@gmail.com> writes:
> On Dec 2, 8:58 am, Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Problem is: this Emacs uniqueness is not documented anywhere. All
>> IDEs look alike because they follow a design pattern which works.
>> There are tons of usability studies done on this. OTOH, how would you
>> develop a project following the Emacs way? Nobody knows. Every
>> Emacser reinvents the wheel.
>
> I have yet to meet a code-completion package which works... for Emacs
> Lisp! AutoComplete is what comes closer, but still it tries to
> complete lisp symbols with words gathered around. Also, Emacs has no
> awareness of projects, thus I resorted to one big .emacs file.
Somewhat confusingly there are two different versions of eProject -
neither of which I managed to use or understand ;( More a reflection on
the time (or lack of) I assigned to trying to use them I think. There is
also EDE ( I think it is) which is a component of CEDET but getting
Cedet going is a substantial task in itself.
- too many buffers, Jack Hokus, 2010/12/09
- Re: too many buffers, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Tim X, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Miles Bader, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08
- Re: too many buffers, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
Re: too many buffers, Elena, 2010/12/08