Re: How speedup find-dired?

[Oleksandr Gavenko]

On 18.01.2011 17:17, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Oleksandr Gavenko<gavenko@bifit.com.ua>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:08:07 +0200
> >
> > I wrote that I try "-ls", but see output:
> >
> >     $ find . -ls
> > 562949953421501    2 -rw-r--r--   1 user     Отсутствует
> >    1539 июн 16  2010 ./.emacs
> > 14355223812252264   24 -rw-r--r--   1 user     Отсутствует
>
> What's wrong with that?
>
> > As I wrote there are many useless data, I need only file names!
>
> You cannot do with file names alone, since Dired needs the "ls" format
> shown above, or else it will not work.
That I say. It is sad that Emacs historically have dired based on ls.

dired is cool and many based on it, like find-dired.

'find-dired' is work some how and no one interesting in improvement:
get just list on file paths and ability press RET to enter to file!

> > My point is when I promote Emacs to my colleagues I must say that they need
> > find/grep/ls. Some of this people don't know what is this at all.
> >
> > They say that their favorite IDE make this out of the box and
> > surprised that Emacs can not just handle such simple things.
>
> Emacs has all that, of course.  There's ls-lisp.el, find-lisp.el, "M-x
> occur", etc.
I try experiment to replace find/ls/grep invocation
with lisp analog.

'occur' is thing that I like because it based on pure Emacs!

I think Emacs need pure Emacs  realization for lgrep/rgrep/find-dired.

Sorry if it already exist, please tell me in that case!