[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functi
|
From: |
address@hidden |
|
Subject: |
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:03:45 -0800 (PST) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Jan 7, 11:47 am, Jan Burse <janbu...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> This is quite funny to write a tractate about operator definitions
> to comp.lang.prolog. Prolog has already for some time operator
> definitions.
Yes, and you can define infix operators with it too! Making your code
nice and easy to read, and avoiding all this Neanderthal RPN stuff. I
guess some people just like to do things the hard way?
- Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, (continued)
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, Xah Lee, 2011/01/07
Re: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?, m_l_g3, 2011/01/18