[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Official Git mirror?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: Official Git mirror? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:40:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> It seems that "nosmart" is used for compensating for servers with busy
>> CPUs
>
> No, it's used to compensate for overly "smart" server when there's no
> win in being smart, because you need to send everything anyway.
But then the plan is failing, because the timings I posted show that
"smart" wins over "nosmart" even when a weak server is servicing a
mighty client over a fast network.
> The "smart" part is for sending less data, which is not going to win
> for the initial checkout.
You said on the other post that cloning time is network-bound. So being
smart and sending less data would be better.
[snip]
- Re: Official Git mirror?, (continued)
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Leo, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Tim X, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror? -- Request, Perry Smith, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror? -- Request, andrea crotti, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2011/02/23
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/23
- Re: Official Git mirror?, jun yu, 2011/02/23