Re: What's your favourite *under_publicized* editing feature ofEmacs?

[David Kastrup]

Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mar 3, 1:06 am, Jason Earl <je...@notengoamigos.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 02 2011, Cthun wrote:
>> > On 02/03/2011 6:54 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>> >> On Mar 2, 2:20 pm, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>  wrote:
>> >>> On 02/03/2011 4:51 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>> >>>>> Classic illogic. "Common Lisp" not being an acronym has nothing to do
>> >>>>> with emacs, Dutchman.
>>
>> >>>> Oops. A serious bug in the Cthun-bot. Incorrectly picked up who it was
>> >>>> responding to.
>>
>> >>> Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> >>> that alias.
>>
>> >> Just to prevent confusion here, the Chun-bot has incorrectly referred
>> >> to it's name as an alias. Cthun-bot is the actual name of the Cthun-
>> >> bot, not an alias. The alias of the Cthun-bot is Cthun.
>>
>> > Who is "Cthun-bot", Dutchman? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> > that alias.
>>
>> You are the Cthun-bot, your alias is Cthun.
>
> Not only... the bot is written in Common Lisp (as tfb confessed :) ),
> hence its psychology :)

Well, the overuse of keywords is quite glaring.

-- 
David Kastrup