[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
seemingly superfluous completions from code in completion.el
From: |
Alan |
Subject: |
seemingly superfluous completions from code in completion.el |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:11:20 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
This is a post seeking enlightenment on the behavior of completion
functions as provided by the code in "completion.el". I initialize
this by the lines
(require 'completion)
(dynamic-completion-mode)
in my initialization file. I am using GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-
nt5.1.2600) of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO.
In the *scratch* buffer I type the following
01234567890123456789
I then type the line
012
and use the function "complete" five times, which offers me the typed-
in string shortened by one character each time after the first. If I
then use function "save-completions-to-file" and examine the result, I
see
("0123456789012345" . 361635)
("01234567890123456" . 361635)
("012345678901234567" . 361635)
("0123456789012345678" . 361635)
("01234567890123456789" . 361635)
as the saved completions. Four of these seem superfluous and not of
interest.
I can avoid these superfluous completions by making a change that
affects what the function "completion-before-command" does. It is
present in the hook:
"pre-command-hook" is "(completion-before-command tooltip-hide)"
The original definition is
(defun completion-before-command ()
(funcall (or (and (symbolp this-command)
(get this-command 'completion-function))
'use-completion-under-or-before-point)))
One way to make the change is to add to the property list of "self-
insert-command" the pair "completion-function (lambda ())", so that
'use-completion-under-or-before-point never gets used ahead of "self-
insert-command".
The enlightenment I seek is an explanation of what utility these
seemingly superfluous completions might have.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- seemingly superfluous completions from code in completion.el,
Alan <=