[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: leaving comint.el for a better emacs shell
From: |
Terrence Brannon |
Subject: |
Re: leaving comint.el for a better emacs shell |
Date: |
Mon, 16 May 2011 08:38:47 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On May 14, 9:48 pm, Tim X <t...@nospam.dev.null> wrote:
> there are other modes that use
> comint for communicaitons with external/remote systems that allow
> multiple instances with different names.
shell-current-directory.el does that for comint-based shell and has
for many years. I use it with TRAMP for that successfully.
I'm just a little irked that this one script works in emacs-eshell and
emacs-term but not emacs-comint
It also works just fine at the shell
> This would indicate there is
> nothing inherent to comint that prevents multiple instances. I also have
> comint based modes that will connect remotely if I execute the mode
> while viewing a remote directory/file. So that aspect also does not seem
> to be related to comint per se.
I dont think I said that comint wouldnt do that. It's just a
requirement of whatever else I use to replace comint (since comint
also does it)