[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: origin of `notation'
From: |
Scott Burson |
Subject: |
Re: origin of `notation' |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:27:20 -0000 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Nov 15, 12:01 am, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 12:22 pm, "Buchs, Kevin" <buchs.ke...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
> > Ok, dumb question to which I have been unable to find the answer and which
> > is distracting me:
>
> > In emacs documentation, what is the origin of using the accent grave
> > (backtick) to introduce a quoted phrase, often a command, while using an
> > apostrophe to terminate it. Example: (info) Keys and Commands: 1st
> > paragraph: "binding" is quoted as such, but 2nd paragraph, `next-line' is
> > quoted that way. If someone who knows the answer will take the time to
> > answer, I promise I will document it on the Emacs wiki. Does this extend
> > beyond emacs? Beyond GNU & FSF?
>
> it's a hack of 1970s to overcome the lack of proper matching quote
> characters in ASCII.
Right. In some old X fonts, actually, the two characters are mirror
images, though it's rare to see them done like that anymore.
-- Scott