Aaron Meurer
On Friday, May 18, 2012, BDB wrote:
Mark Skilbeck wrote:
> How exactly are you cycling through the buffers? If you know the names of
> the buffers, simply using C-x b with a partial-string can complete the buffer
> name for you. If you don't know the names of the buffers you're interested in,
> you're still going ot require casting an eye on the buffer list. Really,
> what's 3 extra buffer names?
I like to use next-buffer bound to a key to cycle through the open buffers.
I googled around and found buffer-stack.el, which kind of minimizes the
problem by keeping the less recently used buffers at the bottom of the stack,
however it's still annoying to have the clutter around. It's actually pretty
surprising nobody has made a fix for this.
> P.S. If you're not, you should probably be using IDO[1].
Thanks, but I'm not looking to change my behavior to fit emacs, but the
other way around :)