Re: Emacs for email: Rmail v VM v Gnus

[James Freer]

On 4 July 2012 19:07, Francesco Mazzoli <f@mazzo.li> wrote:
> Sorry if I sidetrack the conversation a bit, but I just want to
> suggest Wanderlust, which has worked beautifully for me.
>
> If your goal is to read mail via IMAP, I think WL is the best
> solution, and also the simplest, in the sense that you won't need
> anything else apart from wanderlust (on the other hand, configuring WL
> itself is a bit of an adventure).
>
> --
> Francesco * Often in error, never in doubt
>

Thanks I read about WL and it does look rather easier to me to set up
than the others.

I wanted to try each of them but does anyone use Rmail? if not why
not? As i mentioned in the first post it does seem to have had a
revamp recently as it was claimed it copes with conversation threads.

james