[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is mcomplete.el still relevant?
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: Is mcomplete.el still relevant? |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:56:35 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Jul 26 2012, Le Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Sohail Somani <sohail@taggedtype.net
>> wrote:
>
> Do you know how to get ido fuzzy matching with helm? This is my
> current issue :)
>
>
> I'm not sure what this is. Best to ask Thierry on github. (and
> explain what you mean while you're at it).
Not that anyone asked me, but in a way fuzzy matching is one of the main
reasons I use Emacs. You type a _non-contiguous_ string of letters, and
ido-mode (or whatever else), gradually narrows the possible matches down
to one. That (plus the way emacs fills in the blanks for you at the M-x
prompt) made me realize that "usability" and swooshy window animations
are quite unrelated concepts. I saw a variable called `ido-everywhere'
and though, "yes please!".
--
GNU Emacs 24.1.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.11)
of 2012-07-23 on pellet
Re: Is mcomplete.el still relevant?, Christopher Schmidt, 2012/07/25
Re: Is mcomplete.el still relevant?, Minejima Yuji, 2012/07/26