[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:49:47 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Óscar Fuentes <ofv <at> wanadoo.es> writes:
>
> Emacs has partial support for some of those features, with CEDET always
> shining on the horizon, but instead of catching up with other IDEs as
> time passes, it is falling behind.
>
The Eclipse developers should be persuaded somehow to separate
the completion/refactoring stuff into a separate library. Is
there a reason why this part is tied to their GUI editor? If it
were a separate library then any editor could use it, not just
Eclipse.
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Tom <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Philipp Haselwarter, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06