|
From: | Ken Goldman |
Subject: | Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: | Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:00:54 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
On 10/4/2012 12:48 PM, Wally Lepore wrote:
Text Editor: emacs GUI Builder: GTK+2 or Glade Compiler: MinGW Debugger: ?
gdb
Linker: ? Standard "C" Library: ?
come with WindowsAt some point, you want to get 'make', which automates the compile/link steps. Any serious project needs a build program.
~~This is heresy on an emacs list (hence the private email), but I don't think emacs is a very good debugger. I certainly use it for all my editing in all languages, but not for debugging.
On Windows, I use either Eclipse or MS Visual C++. Both have a learning curve and some setup for each project, but then they work well.
On Linux, I use ddd (a GUI front end to gdb.) The UI isn't as polished as the Windows programs, but it requires zero configuration.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |