[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:16:48 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> I believe there is a project (led by some Google engineers) to have code
> completion using clang based servers for editors like Vim and Emacs.
> Phoronix reported on it a while back.
>
But clang does only C/C++ and stuff, doesn't it? Eclipse has excellent
Java support and it is open source software, so it would be logical to
make the completion/refactoring engine independent of the Eclipse
GUI, so that other FOSS editors can have access to the same level of
Java support as Eclipse has.
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Tom <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Philipp Haselwarter, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19