[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:40:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tom <adatgyujto@gmail.com> writes:
> The Eclipse developers should be persuaded somehow to separate
> the completion/refactoring stuff into a separate library. Is
> there a reason why this part is tied to their GUI editor? If it
> were a separate library then any editor could use it, not just
> Eclipse.
Right. Something similar is mostly done for C# on Windows. Idebridge [1]
uses the SharpDevelop libraries for smart code completion and online
documentation. It works quite well once you patch it a bit (see the
Issues page on the project database)
1: http://code.google.com/p/idebridge/
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Philipp Haselwarter, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19