[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 22:17:54 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Tima wrote:
> The programming feature I miss most in emacs is the code browsing:
> jump to the definition of a method, function, class, variable, and
> jump back to the original position. I tried to configure CEDET to do
> this, but have not succeeded so far.
I have always used TAGs tables created using the etags comand for
this. Then M-. , C-x 5 . and so forth. Then I usually M-*
pop-tag-mark or pop-global-mark or some such to return. In the Emacs
manual this is described in the "Tags Tables" section.
Bob
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Philipp Haselwarter, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Bob Proulx <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20