[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Philipp Haselwarter |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:39:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Oct 05 2012 16:49 (@1349448587), Tom wrote:
> Óscar Fuentes <ofv <at> wanadoo.es> writes:
>>
>> Emacs has partial support for some of those features, with CEDET always
>> shining on the horizon, but instead of catching up with other IDEs as
>> time passes, it is falling behind.
>>
>
> The Eclipse developers should be persuaded somehow to separate
> the completion/refactoring stuff into a separate library. Is
> there a reason why this part is tied to their GUI editor? If it
> were a separate library then any editor could use it, not just
> Eclipse.
That would be Eclipse headless. Check out eclim.
--
Philipp Haselwarter
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Philipp Haselwarter <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19