[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:42:23 +0200 |
> From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:55:07 +0200
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> > At least in C and C++, tags never miss a definition for me. My only
> > problem with tags is that they sometimes show me more definitions
> > other than what I had in mind that match the symbol I type, either
> > because of case insensitivity or because of partial matches.
>
> Can tags filter out those symbols that would match what you're typing,
> but aren't reachable from the point in the code where you are typing?
I don't understand the question. Tags don't "match symbols", they
show you the definition of the symbol. That definition is not related
to scope.
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Doug Lewan, 2012/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
Re: IDE versus emacs, Ken Goldman, 2012/10/05