Re: Style Issues in Lisp and Scheme programming, setq versus let ... and onion structure with multiple cores or eyes or kernels Re: string to list or string to array

[Stefan Monnier]

> btw, Lisp's prefix notation, (f x y z) is more expressive and
> convenient for expressing currying (((f x) y) z) than f(x y z).

With all due respect to Lisp, that's not true.  Curried calls in the
non-Lisp syntax are simply "f(x)(y)(z)" or even better "f x y z".


        Stefan