[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:42:46 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) |
drain <aeuster@gmail.com> writes:
> Has anyone tried out Scrivener? I'm curious if does anything (substantive)
> that Emacs cannot do.
To add another unsatisfying answer to the bunch, I'm almost certain that
yes, it does. Junding from the screenshots, it features a more
visual-oriented interface that should be more comfortable for
non-programmers.
For example, this view looks like something that would be hard to
replicate with what Emacs provides currently:
http://www.literatureandlatte.com/gfx/ScrivShots/win-write_structure_revise-lg.jpg
On the other hand, if you know what you're doing, Emacs has tools for
managing notes, cross-references, etc, that many people find sufficient.
See Org mode, for example.
--Dmitry
- Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener,
Dmitry Gutov <=
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Susan Cragin, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Xavier Maillard, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Burton Samograd, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, William Gardella, 2012/11/27
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/24