[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener
|
From: |
drain |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:13:18 -0800 (PST) |
Xavier Maillard-8 wrote
> We are on a GNU mailing list. Why do you want to promote such (privative?)
> software here ?
Any promotion is incidental to the question, which aims to discover missing
Emacs figures: crucial to expanding and improving it, and attracting new
users, perhaps users of Scrivener.
--
View this message in context:
http://emacs.1067599.n5.nabble.com/Emacs-vs-Scrivener-tp270162p270396.html
Sent from the Emacs - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Emacs vs Scrivener, drain, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Susan Cragin, 2012/11/19
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Xavier Maillard, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener,
drain <=
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Burton Samograd, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, William Gardella, 2012/11/27
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Oleksandr Gavenko, 2012/11/25