[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:10:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Oleksandr Gavenko <gavenkoa@gmail.com> writes:
> On 2012-11-24, Bastien wrote:
>
>> One feature that can be implemented for Emacs is this one: bind several
>> windows together and have some commands act on them all.
>>
>> For example, if you have a two-windows frame, you can bind these two windows
>> and run C-s in both of them simultaneously.
>
> Do you think about workflow? Each C-s move across matches in all window or
> sequentially? What if match in another window?
I was thinking of something synchroneous.
But early prototypes might tell what is more handy.
>> Another example: you could open two dired buffers then run M-% (and `D') in
>> both of them simultaneously.
>>
> Emacs remember arguments for command so it is easy to duplicate repeat actions
> across buffers. Also keyboard macros help a lot...
Yes.
--
Bastien
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, (continued)
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/21
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Burton Samograd, 2012/11/22
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, William Gardella, 2012/11/27
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/11/24
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Oleksandr Gavenko, 2012/11/25
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener,
Bastien <=
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Matt Price, 2012/11/26
- Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Bastien, 2012/11/26
Re: Emacs vs Scrivener, Stefan Monnier, 2012/11/19