[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About equality in Emacs
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: About equality in Emacs |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Feb 2013 17:22:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free@gmail.com> writes:
> In the trunk version of (info "(cl) Equality Predicates"):
>
> Also note that the Common Lisp functions `member' and `assoc' use
> `eql' to compare elements, whereas Emacs Lisp follows the MacLisp
> tradition and uses `equal' for these two functions. In Emacs, use
> `memq' (or `cl-member') and `assq' (or `cl-assoc') to get functions
> which use `eql' for comparisons.
>
> I'm confused with the last sentence. Don't `memq' and `assq' compare
> objects with `eq'?
Perhaps. But in Common Lisp, it would be EQL, since (eq 1 1) or (eq #\a
#\a) can return NIL. (member 1 '(1 2 3) :test (function eq)) is not
conforming in Common Lisp.
In emacs lisp, the difference between eq and eql is for floating point
numbers, where (eq 1.0 1.0) --> nil while (eql 1.0 1.0) --> t
In emacs-version "24.2.1":
(memq 1 '(1 2)) --> (1 2)
(memq 1.0 '(1.0 2.0)) --> nil
memq uses eq, so it's no good on floating point numbers.
> Why does the manual say that they "get functions
> which use `eql' for comparisons"?
The sentence is: "In Emacs, use `memq' (or `cl-member') and `assq' (or
`cl-assoc') to get functions which use `eql' for comparisons."
The original sentence was: "In Emacs, use `member*' and `assoc*' to get
functions which use `eql' for comparisons."
The original meant that if you want to compare with eql, then instead of
using member or assoc, you would use member* and assoc*.
The new version indeed is hard to understand. Does it mean that memq
and assq now use eql? I'd be surprised if it did.
New emacs: Old emacs:
memq assq ? eq memq assq
member assoc equal member assoc
cl-member cl-assoc eql member* assoc*
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.