[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About definition finding
|
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
|
Subject: |
Re: About definition finding |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:41:13 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
On 03/07/2013 06:31 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
Note that this doc section's guideline conflicts a bit with
that of adding a package/library prefix to such macros. E.g.,
`icicle-define-command' vs `define-icicle-command'. I put
the library prefix first, but others might do otherwise.
Does alias make sense? E.g., `package-list-packages' is an alias of
`list-packages'.
First, note also that `list-packages' is a command, not a macro. The aliasing
in that case is presumably for user convenience interactively.
Sorry, I forgot it.
[...]
In principle, the guidelines are there to help you and those who use your code.
But remember that they are just guidelines, not rules to be followed blindly
without using your judgment. Do what makes the most sense to you, after reading
the guidelines.
That's true, especially for those in (info "(elisp) C Integer Types").
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao