[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About "set bits"
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: About "set bits" |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:33:28 +0800 |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:37:19 -0400
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> In article <mailman.23883.1365607222.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:46:27 +0800
> > > From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > In (info "(elisp) Bindat Spec"):
> > >
> > > `bits LEN'
> > > List of set bits in LEN bytes. The bytes are taken in big endian
> > > order and the bits are numbered starting with `8 * LEN - 1' and
> > > ending with zero. For example: `bits 2' unpacks `#x28' `#x1c' to
> > > `(2 3 4 11 13)' and `#x1c' `#x28' to `(3 5 10 11 12)'.
> > >
> > > I don't know what "set bits" means here.
> >
> > It means bits that are set, i.e. their value is 1.
I see, thanks.
> Xue's questions about documentation often seem to suggest that he
> doesn't know how to parse English. He frequently tries to interpret
> phrases as computer or Emacs jargon, when they just have the meaning the
> words imply.
I think you're right, and I'm trying to improve this problem.
--
Xue Fuqiao
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
- About "set bits", Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/10
- Re: About "set bits", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/10
- Re: About "set bits", Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: About "set bits", Barry Margolin, 2013/04/10
- Re: About "set bits", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/11
- Message not available
- Re: About "set bits", Barry Margolin, 2013/04/11
- Re: About "set bits", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/04/12
- Re: About "set bits", Xue Fuqiao, 2013/04/12