Re: special characters for abbrev

[Emanuel Berg]

Muhali <muhali@users.sf.net> writes:

> Thanks. But when and where was the change, since it used to work
> before?

I don't know. But: Why does it matter? Are you going to revert to
a legacy Emacs version just to expand `fu into function?

If you really want it, possibly you can change the definition of a
word - perhaps sensibly, only for the specific mode, in which you
need it, not to cause unnecessary havoc. But I'd advice against
this. Again, read the material I sent you last time (if you didn't
already).

Why is it so important with `fu? Why can't you make it xfu or
whatever?

Just sayin'.

-- 
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573