[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:08:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marc Weber <marco-oweber@gmx.de> writes:
> I've been starting to learn Vim in the first place because I
> felt hitting meta- and ctrl- all the time would hurt my fingers
Yes, it hurt my fingers bad for a while. I solved it by wearing
gloves with cut fingers (like the one burglar use), and, instead
of the Meta key, I setup another prefix key, C-o [1], as well as
the shell-like-CLI described in another thread, on M-i. It is
actually not the Meta key, but M-x, that is my problem.
> You cannot compare Vim & Emacs, neither should you.
Why not?
> Both are well suited to edit "text", thus to write emails.
Are there vim equivalences for rmail and Gnus?
> If anybody prefers one over the other its a very personal
> preference.
No, it can be analyzed. I haven't used vim 1% of my Emacs time, so
I'm not the person to do it, though.
> So this thread might end up being yet another flame war.
All threads might end up in flame wars. But we are not flaming
now, and I'm not about to, either.
> Without giving reasons your sentence looks like being a personal
> preference only. So we should not comment on it.
So your comment is that we should not comment on it...
> WTF - never heared about IDEA, Eclipse, Netbeans, JEdit,
> notepad++ and what not?
I've heard of Eclipse, Netbeans, and notepad++, and I know enough
about them to never, *ever* trade Emacs for that. I mean... sure,
you can program on my TI-83 calculator (in Basic) - or you can do
O's and 1's in a cave well, with a stone axe. But I never met a
programmer who did that, and I don't think that is by chance.
> And there are many many many blogs which get written in browsers
> probably (?) (Think about the facebook community alone)
I hate FB and blogs (the technology that is, I know there are good
blog posts), and the bare thought of writing in a browser is
repulsive. (Unless the browser is Emacs-w3m.)
> Also there are "multiple forks of Emacs" - talking about one
> Emacs could be too limited.
I talk about GNU Emacs on a Linux or otherwise Unix system.
> Let's say it differently: Just because you cannot imagine
> programmers using tools others than Emacs/Vim, it doesn't mean
> that no such programmers/programs exist. "The black swan" is a
> book dedicated to this topic.
Let's put it this way: all the programmers I've met who I have
respect for, as programmers and otherwise, use Emacs or Vim.
> Eg one thing which comes to my mind is "disassemblers", there
> are some dedicated tools which eventually outperform Emacs.
What's that?
> Well - emacs can display images, Vim cannot. So yes, Emacs
> eventually is better for some latex tasks.
The LaTeX mode is very helpful. I don't use Emacs to show the
PDFs, as I always use Emacs in a Linux VT. I just switch to X with
M-u and check the PDF file in xpdf.
> And depending on what you need, neither Vim nor Emacs should be
> the tool of your choice, or can Emacs do VBA completion !? :-)
> (I didn't look it up, maybe it even can, but I think writing
> Word macros should still be done using the Word Macro editor)
It *is* Emacs or Vim. 100%. Why on earth would you use Word (?!) -
at all, ever? What would you need it for?
> Thus unless there is a particular use case the whole discusion
> is pretty much void IMHO.
For a void discussion, you sure had a lot to say.
[1]
(defun init-C-o-prefix ()
(interactive)
(define-prefix-command 'C-o-prefix)
(global-set-key "\C-o" 'C-o-prefix)
(init-C-o-keys) )
(add-hook 'after-init-hook 'init-C-o-prefix)
(defun init-C-o-keys ()
(interactive)
(let ((map (current-global-map)))
(define-key map "\C-o1" 'delete-other-windows)
(define-key map "\C-o2" 'split-window-vertically)
(define-key map "\C-os" 'web-search)
; etc.
))
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/30
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/30
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/08/26
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/27
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
Message not availableRe: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/27