[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:55:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
wgreenhouse@riseup.net (W. Greenhouse) writes:
> I don't think Google Trends is an accurate measure of how many
> people are using Emacs, because Emacs is largely
> self-documenting, not just through the Info manuals but also
> from the dynamically generated documentation from Elisp programs
> themselves.
I've heard that Emacs is self-documenting numerous times, and, if
this refers to the docstrings of Elisp functions, I have to say
"self-documenting" is stretching the truth. The docstrings are a
handy way to provide documentation, and the Emacs access to that
documentation is provided instantly upon evaluation of the defun
(of if it is some other thing: a variable, perhaps). This is all
well and good, but the documentation has to be written
nonetheless, like any other documentation.
Emacs can also tell you the parameters of a function, where it is
defined (and provide hyperlinks), etc., and this is indispensable
knowledge, for sure - but perhaps not "documentation" as much as a
specification for a person who already knows the workings.
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Perry Smith, 2013/08/26
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Peter Dyballa, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Suvayu Ali, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Ken Goldman, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29