[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
|
From: |
Rustom Mody |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2013 04:36:49 -0700 (PDT) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Friday, October 4, 2013 11:15:34 PM UTC+5:30, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Remember, "Advance too fast, you catch up with
> death. But advance too slow, death catches up with
> *you*."
Nice quote! Thanks! Is there a well known source?
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Tom Davey, 2013/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, henry atting, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/10/11
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/04
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Rustom Mody <=
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/13