[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding
From: |
Rustom Mody |
Subject: |
Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Oct 2013 04:27:09 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 9:51:33 PM UTC+5:30, Drew Adams wrote:
> Definitely. Those who imagine that a lexical-only approach, a la
> Scheme, would be a better way to go for Emacs are on the wrong track,
> IMHO.
You can have dynamic scoping in scheme if you want
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dorai/t-y-scheme/t-y-scheme-Z-H-7.html#node_sec_5.2
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, (continued)
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/13
- RE: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Drew Adams, 2013/10/13
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/14
- RE: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Drew Adams, 2013/10/14
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/14
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/14
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/15
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/15
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Barry Margolin, 2013/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding,
Rustom Mody <=
Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/14
Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding, Barry Margolin, 2013/10/12