Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding

[Kai Großjohann]

Phillip Lord wrote:
> 
> None the less, I think you are hitting a strawman here; if Emacs went
> entirely lexically bound, I don't think that it necessarily follows that
> elisp will turn into Java.

Sorry, Phil, that's not what I meant.  I think I got carried away a
little there.  Even if Emacs were to move to Guile: Scheme has fluid-let.

All I wanted to point out is that this idea of dynamic binding is more
powerful than one might think at first.

Kai