[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fire defun by typing keyword
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Fire defun by typing keyword |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Nov 2013 23:26:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Postbox 3.0.8 (Macintosh/20130427) |
Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
> While I still think this aspect is grossly overlooked, I
> don't think it is "all about that" anymore. I certainly
> have the time to write a for loop now and then without
> my mind beaming away in some other direction, hopelessly
> lost forever after.
I don't think it's "grossly overlooked". In Java, verbosity is so bad
that a lot of tooling has sprung up around helping with this kind of
thing. I guess every Java "IDE" allows you to add a member to a class
and then auto-create getter and setter for it. And Eclipse at least has
this template for a for loop that does just what I suggested.
I think it's a matter of the amount of verbosity. In Java, it never
bothered me to write a for loop, so I didn't use IDE support for that.
But I've used IDE support more than once for getters and setters :-(
I wonder how the Ada community approaches this aspect.
Kai
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, (continued)
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/07
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Peter Dyballa, 2013/11/08
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/08
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, John Bokma, 2013/11/09
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/09
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/09
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/11
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Alan Schmitt, 2013/11/08
- Message not available
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Alan Schmitt, 2013/11/08
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Peter Dyballa, 2013/11/08
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword,
Kai Großjohann <=
- Message not available
- Re: Fire defun by typing keyword, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/09