Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations

[Yuri Khan]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> wrote:

> What is not general but *does* fit together
> - I mean, it could be put together into a "taste" or
> "flavor" package if that is a game anyone enjoys, but
> to perfect and communicate the really useful stuff is
> much more important.

It just occurred to me that it’s not so much a “taste” or “flavor” as
a “topping”. Meaning, you can usually have just one of the available
flavors, but any subset of available toppings.