Re: Specifying arguments to interactive functions

[dont . spam . earl]

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 1:04:01 AM UTC-7, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> () dont.spam.earl@gmail.com
> 
> () Wed, 14 May 2014 22:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> 
> 
>    Any suggestions on how to simplify this?
> 
> 
> 
>                 '(48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57)
> 
> 
> 
> These are code points for ASCII "0" through "9", and are already as
> 
> simple as possible, in one sense, but not in the "wait six months and
> 
> re-grok quickly the code" sense.  Better to be symbolic (not necessarily
> 
> w/ Lisp symbols, but rather w/ human-friendly expressions).
> 
> 
> 
> For example, you can:
> 
> - compress:       (number-sequence 48 57)
> 
> - use characters: (number-sequence ?0 ?9)
> 
> - go up a level:  (interactive "P") + SMOP
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Thien-Thi Nguyen
> 
>    GPG key: 4C807502
> 
>    (if you're human and you know it)
> 
>       read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
> 
>                                (not (via 'mailing-list)))
> 
>                      => nil

Thanks. Any tips on passing an argument to 'switch-to-interactive-buffer while 
having it still call 'interactive to get the digit from the user?