[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2014 03:38:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> I never heard of WordStar - it doesn't seem to be
> related to Oracle's StarOffice either because it
> originated from a program called StarWriter.
Wait... It's coming back to me. Like a blue, gray, and
white star as the splash screen, for the early PC? Back
then, I used computers from the accursed Apple world,
so the word processors were MacWrite, M$ Word, and,
much later, ClarisWorks (shivers). On the PC at
somewhat the same time, perhaps a bit later, there were
the WordPerfect, which was simpler, along with Word.
For the Unix world, I have read there was once an
editor called ed that didn't showed the file being
manipulated at all - the "state" of the file, as it was
called (unbelievable). Some people actually liked that,
so some other people made em ("ed for mortals") which I
believe showed a single line - that project (em) forked
to ex (extended editor) and ded (display editor). ex
later became vi (visual editor) and even later vim ("vi
improved").
Emacs (or EMACS, the macro editor) came from the MIT
project TECO (text/tape editor and corrector).
nano is another very basic editor yet to be mentioned.
sed (stream editor) is not really an editor - a batch
editor perhaps, but then there are many Unix tools that
maps input to output, where both currencies are text
streams.
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RTF for emacs, (continued)
- Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/26
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- Re: editor and word processor history, Glyn Millington, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history, Haines Brown, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Allan Streib, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Bob Proulx, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Rusi, 2014/05/30
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29