[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Always using let*
From: |
Joe Fineman |
Subject: |
Re: Always using let* |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:40:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> writes:
> Would it be OK to always use let*? I was just bitten by the fact that
> with let you can not previous variables from the let statement, as is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Word missing?
> possible with setq. So I am thinking about always using let*, so I do
> not have to think about it. Or are there good reasons to use let when
> you do not need let*?
--
--- Joe Fineman joe_f@verizon.net
||: The way out is the way in. :||
- Re: Always using let*, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, sokobania . 01, 2014/09/16
- RE: Always using let*, Drew Adams, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
Re: Always using let*,
Joe Fineman <=
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/14
Re: Always using let*, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2014/09/14
Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/15