[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make `r` and `F` behave as `S L` when replying to a message from a m
From: |
Denis Bitouzé |
Subject: |
Re: Make `r` and `F` behave as `S L` when replying to a message from a mailing list |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:31:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Le 07/11/14 à 00h45, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> a écrit :
> Denis Bitouzé <dbitouze@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>
>> I've just been told that when I reply (`r` or `F`)
>> to a message from a mailing list, the `To` is the
>> original message sender's address instead of the
>> mailing list address, the latter being in the `Cc`
>> field.
>>
>> It appears that it should be enough to use `S L` to
>> get the expected behavior (the mailing list address in
>> the `To` field, nothing in `Cc`), but I'd like a
>> unique keybinding for all the "reply" actions.
>>
>> Hence my question: how could I make `r` and `F` behave
>> as `S L` when replying to a message from a mailing
>> list?
>
> I just read this on gnu.emacs.gnus - where it was
> quoted
Quoted?
> (although that message was a bit confusing as well :)
Did I something wrong? :)
> - did you see it?
>
> You are using Gnus, so why not use the mailing lists
> as newsgroups?
See below.
> Or do you use mailing lists that aren't available as
> newsgroups, and then mail-split them to sort-of
> newsgroups?
Indeed: I receive them in my main INBOX.
> But it doesn't really matter - if you found that `S L'
> works (`S L' is
> `gnus-summary-reply-to-list-with-original'), why don't
> you just bind it to a shorter keystroke?
Indeed, but I'd like a single keybinding for all the "reply" actions.
> Or do you want it to be exactly `r' and `F', but have
> them work transparently based on "is it a private
> mail, or is it a listbot mail" DWIM-style?
Exactly! :)
> That would have to involve extracting this from the
> headers somehow if Gnus isn't capable to do this
> already.
As answered to Damien, a further check at the list's headers puzzled me:
`Reply-To:` is the list address, not the sender's one. Why Gnus doesn't
take it into account when I reply with `r` or `F`?
> In either case, isn't it a lot of work for such a small gain?
I'm so lazy that I love work hard in order to be able to be (lazy) ;)
> Why don't use `S L',
Because I'm likely to forget to use this different keybinding when
appropriate.
> or rebind it to a single key?
Okay, but I'd like it to be one the "usual" ones: `r` or `F`.
--
Denis
Re: Make `r` and `F` behave as `S L` when replying to a message from a mailing list, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/06
- Re: Make `r` and `F` behave as `S L` when replying to a message from a mailing list,
Denis Bitouzé <=