[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:14:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:37 PM, <saint@eng.it> wrote:
>
>> Can you change the colors in nano?
>
> Can. But it lacks indirection layers. ...
>
> So one does not simply change one face and get e.g.
> all keywords recolored; instead, one has to copy all
> the relevant configs and edit them for each
> language.
You can also change the color in the terminal below
nano. That is possible in the Linux VT (console, ttys)
but also in X terminals, e.g., xterm, urxvt, and so
on.
I have a page that describes - or shows I should say -
how to do it:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/cols/www/index.html
Go nuts :)
--
underground experts united
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, (continued)
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/15
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Dan Espen, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, saint, 2014/11/17
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs, Yuri Khan, 2014/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: evidence: nano(1) is better than Emacs,
Emanuel Berg <=