[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism
From: |
Dan Espen |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:05:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
> I've not looked at systemd too closely, but AFAICS, the problem is not
> child-diseases, but more that it's not enough unixy.
It's like an echo. I keep reading this same opinion.
1. I don't know much about it
2. It's bad.
Spend a little time appreciating the simplicity of systemd
and then reach your conclusion. In my opinion, the design is
good and it takes a whole bunch of disorganized shell scripts
and turns them into data. I nice simple, readable data structure.
Is it "unixy"?
As if that word meant something, I'd say yes.
It's just the right amount of code to solve the problem.
--
Dan Espen
- Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/29
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2014/11/30
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30