Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism

help-gnu-emacs

From:	Nikolay Kudryavtsev
Subject:	Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism
Date:	Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:16:04 +0300
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

I think Erik Naggum supported a fork of emacs back in the day, becausehe hated MULE.


And I'm not even mentioning xemacs, and other emacsen.

--
Best Regards,
Nikolay Kudryavtsev

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, (continued)
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
- Message not available
  - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/30
    - Message not available
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/30
    - Message not available
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, H. Dieter Wilhelm, 2014/11/30
    - Message not available
    - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30
- Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Nikolay Kudryavtsev <=
- Message not available
  - Re: Elisp addiction not as bad in light of Linux forkoholism, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/30