|
From: | Andreas Röhler |
Subject: | Re: Abbrevs for the most frequent elisp symbols |
Date: | Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:41:40 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 |
On 29.12.2014 16:58, Tom wrote:
Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler <at> easy-emacs.de> writes:The question is: does the occurrence inside the manual or the sourceprovide indication WRT probability ofpersonal usage? As being a heavy abbrevs-user, here my collection of emacs-lisp abbrevsdefined:Certainly, if you assemble a list manually that is more personal. My idea was to assemble an abbrev list automatically, because adding an abbrev for everything manually is cumbersome. It may be more efficient to start from an automatic list and make it more personal, than starting from scratch and adding everything manually.
Sure, finally it's a matter of personal habits. As said, your project is interesting and once pondered to realize it in a simialar way. However, abandoned that path. Beside the reason given: there is the need remember abbrevs - unless it's useless. When defining it manually, you will give a mnemonic abbrev, which presents itself maybe. Apropos cumbersome: there are ways to make that task easier. See ar-mode-abbrev-propose https://github.com/andreas-roehler/werkstatt/blob/master/ar-abbrev-extensions.el Cheers, Andreas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |