Re: ~`symbol-function' to get code as list even when byte-compiled?

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I'll use that for the lambda instead: that way the
>> functions remain unaware which was the idea
>> all along.
>
> That's fine, but then you should name it
> "add-one-shot-hook" since that name implies it can
> be used with any hook and any function placed on
> such a hook, rather than only for those functions
> which want to ignore the arguments provided by the
> hook's caller.

You mean, I should NOT name it that, but
"add-one-shot-hook-args-ignored" or something like
that. OK.

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573