[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?
From: |
Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:06:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I perform search using string-match, and then do the replacement using
> replace-match. Now I'd like to know the position of the end of my
> replacement, so that I know where to start the next search (since I'm
> coding a variant of replace-regexp-in-string). Is there anything like
> that in Emacs, or should I just concatenate the parts before and after
> the match with the match in-between instead of using replace-match, so
> that I can calculate that position myself?
(let ((old-end (prog1 (match-end 1)
(replace-match "newtext" t t nil 1))))
(do-something old-end))
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
“The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a
dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to
keep the man from touching the equipment.” -- Carl Bass CEO Autodesk
- A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?,
Pascal J. Bourguignon <=
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Barry Margolin, 2015/07/19