Re: req-package

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Alexander Shukaev <haroogan@gmail.com> writes:

> Still, I believe it would be to the benefit of the majority to give
> `req-package' a shot and seek to add it as an optional functionality to
> `use-package' while relying on the existing 2.0 framework.

Yes, this is just what I was suggesting, unless I misunderstood something.
use-package hopes to serve as a foundation, with other, more rich frameworks
(like ELPA integration, dependency resolution, etc) sitting on top of it.

John