[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs tshirts
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: emacs tshirts |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:54:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:52:09AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I wish the emacs ninja tshirt didn't have that mouse
>
> Say WHAT?!
>
> > drawn on it along with the monitor and keyboard.
> > Also, while I don't use vi, I respect that concept
> > and wouldn't say that "I don't like it" :)
>
> Only the really old old-schoolers don't like vi.
> Back then, they hadn't seen any of the apocalypse we
> now have, so they could afford to put Emacs against
> vi. Now, with all the <beep beep beep> around, we
> emacsers offer our deepest respect to our colleagues
> using and developing vi(m).
Well put.
Once upon a time it was fun and sportsy to pit Emacs against vi (the
generic vi -- that is vim, elvis & co, not (only9 the proprietary AT&T
vi).
At that time I was mostly vi(m) user and Emacs admirer. These days
I'm more of an Emacs user. I even remember of a paintball contest
between Emacsers & VIers (the VIers won, AFAIR).
These days, discussions between <beep> and <beep beep> feel as if
the lives of the participants and their families' depended on the
outcome. And each party seems dead set to stomp out the other
"because we're right, dammit!".
Yep, you're right.
regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlYKNa4ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYLNgCeI4s1Ax2aB+8JC48CmUi5uuSE
1H4An3dTWjr+9Efnr517myknNWVxPxdK
=Ys6a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----