[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `append' vs. `nconc'
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: `append' vs. `nconc' |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:51:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
> - it's very obvious It's a local value you are
> keeping in your little scope. (One might argue that
> then, it's an idiomatic way to emphasize this fact
> to the (human) reader...)
The thing here is, when it is very obvious and
everything is small and easy to handle, what is the
actual gain in time and space not using `append'?
Answer:
-> 0
But OK, as a matter of principle it can be a cool
thing to know/do.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', tomas, 2015/12/31
- side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Drew Adams, 2015/12/31
- Re: side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
- RE: side effects, list sharing [was: `append' vs. `nconc'], Drew Adams, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc',
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Barry Margolin, 2015/12/31
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/31
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Teemu Likonen, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Emanuel Berg, 2015/12/31
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Teemu Likonen, 2015/12/31
- Message not available
- Re: `append' vs. `nconc', Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/12/30