[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "cl-case" with strings
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: "cl-case" with strings |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:25:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.1 |
On 2016-02-05, at 05:05, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>
>>>> Or this idiom: (cl-case (intern string) ...)
>>>
>>> Then the keys cannot be strings - not an issue in
>>> this "case"...
>>
>> Why not? It works fine for me when `string' is
>> a string.
>
> It works for me too but to me it is rather a hack
> than idiomatic.
Well, it was not my idea - I found it somewhere (can't find it right
now). I'm not sure whether this is a hack or the proper way to do it;
I quite like it personally.
> I'd like the keys to be strings if the (original) data
> is. Then the keys/strings are also properly
> highlighted as strings because that's what they are.
Ah, I see now what you meant.
> Now when I have my defun I don't want to change for
> this, but had I known of this before, perhaps (?)
> I wouldn't have written the defun.
:-)
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, (continued)
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/02/05
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/05
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/02/05
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/04
- Re: "cl-case" with strings,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Message not available
- Re: "cl-case" with strings, Joost Kremers, 2016/02/04
Re: "cl-case" with strings, Emanuel Berg, 2016/02/04