help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should ask-user-about-supersession-threat be aware of noninteractive


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Should ask-user-about-supersession-threat be aware of noninteractive ? (emacs -batch)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:46:07 +0200

> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:50:57 -0800 (PST)
> From: richard.sharman@mitel.com
> Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 20:50:57 +0000
> 
> I'm not sure if this is a bug or not.
> 
> When running emacs -batch,  if a function modifies a buffer and calls 
> save-buffer and there is another emacs -batch also updating the same file, 
> one of them can call ask-user-about-supersession-threat [in userlock.el].
> 
> This causes the emacs process to hang because read-char-choice never returns. 
>  (I have a traceback which I could post but is lengthy (91 levels!);  it ends 
> at pselect and frame 2 is wait_reading_process_output.)
> 
> This happened when running make -j 6 and I changed the scenario to not 
> happen,  but I wondered if ask-user-about-supersession-threat should be act 
> upon variable noninteractive.
> 
> Or is one supposed to supply a replacement for 
> ask-user-about-supersession-threat if running emacs in batch mode?

Please report this (with that traceback, please) using
report-emacs-bug.  It's possible that
ask-user-about-supersession-threat should always provide an automatic
response in batch mode.

Thanks.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]