[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Do you see such a factor-of-2 difference when doing "rm lisp/**/*.elc;
>> make"? Or in which kind of circumstance have you seen such a slowdown?
>
> I measured that by running GNU Find compiled from the same sources on
> a large and deep directory tree on the same Windows 7 box.
>
> That thunking is the culprit is my theory, not a fact; however, I
> cannot find any other explanation. If someone does, I'm all ears.
I mentioned some possibilities on a previous message. Did you use the
same toolset and libraries for the 32 and 64 bits build? The MinGW and
MinGW-w64 (32/64 bits) runtimes diverged quite a bit.
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, moocow062, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/08
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/11
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/11
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/02/12
- Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/12
Re: 64 bit official Windows builds, djc, 2016/02/08