Re: Quick pcase question

[Phillip Lord]

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes:
>>> It's not so much the simplicity, I guess, as the intuitiveness -- "(and x"
>>> looks like a test to me, not an assignment. My brain would prefer:
>>>
>>> (,x (pred stringp))
>>
>> What about?
>>
>> (guard (stringp ,x))
>
> You're suggesting that as a possible alternate syntax, right? (In which
> case I like it.) It doesn't actually work now, does it?

Yes, apologies, my post wasn't very clear.

Phil